Super precedent huh? Translation, an abstract concept of leftists that isn’t actually in the Constitution anywhere…

FEINSTEIN: “Thank you. If these judgments when combined do not constitute super precedent, I don’t know what does. Importantly, the dozens of cases affirming Roe are not only about precedent. They are also about a woman’s fundamental and constitutional rights. Roe ensured that women and their doctors will decide what’s best for their care, not politicians. President Trump repeatedly promised that his judicial nominees would be pro-life end quote, ‘automatically,’ end quote, overturn Roe V. Wade.

Judge Gorsuch has not had occasion to rule directly on a case involving Roe. However, his writings do raise questions. Specifically, he wrote that he believes there are no exceptions to the principle that quote, ‘the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong,’ end quote. This language has been interpreted by both pro-life and pro-choice organizations to mean he would overturn Roe. The Supreme Court is also expected to decide what kind of reasonable regulation states and localities can implement to protect our neighborhoods and schools from gun violence.”